In the first part of this article we covered the storage systems architectures, now we want do give some insights on how to cope with system failures and data loss:
Though you may not be able to prevent a disaster from happening, you may be able to minimize your downtime.
There are many ways to reduce or eliminate the impact of storage system failures. For example, you can add redundancy to primary storage systems. These options include duplicate storage systems or identical servers, known as “mirror sites.” Adding an elaborate backup processes or file-system “snapshots” that always have a checkpoint to restore to, will provide another level of data protection. Some of these options can be quite costly making them affordable only to large business organizations.
Experience has shown there are usually multiple or rolling failures that happen when an organization has a data disaster. Therefore, to rely on just one restoration protocol is short-sighted. An organization with a successful data storage setup will have multiple layers of restoration pathways.
We have heard thousands of IT horror stories of initial storage failures turning into complete data calamities. In an effort to bring back a system, some choices can permanently corrupt the data.
There are several risk mitigation policies that storage administrators can adopt that will help minimize data loss when a disaster happens: